Enhanced PHP File Manager

⬆️ Go Up (..)

📊 Server Information

Server:

nginx/1.28.0

System:

Linux 6.8.0-90-generic

PHP Version:

8.4.15

User:

alqudsvolunteers

Directory:

/home/alqudsvolunteers/rootlink/proc/thread-self/root/usr/share/doc/bpfcc-tools/examples/doc

Free Space:

80.2 GB

🔧 Quick Actions

✏️ Editing: cpuunclaimed_example.txt

Demonstrations of cpuunclaimed, the Linux eBPF/bcc version.

This tool samples the length of the CPU run queues and determine when there are
idle CPUs, yet queued threads waiting their turn. It reports the amount of idle
(yet unclaimed by waiting threads) CPU as a system-wide percentage. For
example:

# ./cpuunclaimed.py
Sampling run queues... Output every 1 seconds. Hit Ctrl-C to end.
%CPU  83.00%, unclaimed idle 0.12%
%CPU  87.25%, unclaimed idle 0.38%
%CPU  85.00%, unclaimed idle 0.25%
%CPU  85.00%, unclaimed idle 0.25%
%CPU  80.88%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
%CPU  82.25%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
%CPU  83.50%, unclaimed idle 0.12%
%CPU  81.50%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
%CPU  81.38%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
[...]

This shows a system running at over 80% CPU utilization, and with less than
0.5% unclaimed idle CPUs.

Unclaimed idle CPUs can happen for a number of reasons:

- An application has been bound to some, but not all, CPUs, and has runnable
  threads that cannot migrate to other CPUs due to this configuration.
- CPU affinity: an optimization that leaves threads on CPUs where the CPU
  caches are warm, even if this means short periods of waiting while other
  CPUs are idle. The wait period is tunale (see sysctl, kernel.sched*).
- Scheduler bugs.

An unclaimed idle of < 1% is likely to be CPU affinity, and not usually a
cause for concern. By leaving the CPU idle, overall throughput of the system
may be improved. This tool is best for identifying larger issues, > 2%, due
to the coarseness of its 99 Hertz samples.

This is an 8 CPU system, with an 8 CPU-bound threaded application running that
has been bound to one CPU (via taskset):

# ./cpuunclaimed.py 
Sampling run queues... Output every 1 seconds. Hit Ctrl-C to end.
%CPU  12.63%, unclaimed idle 86.36%
%CPU  12.50%, unclaimed idle 87.50%
%CPU  12.63%, unclaimed idle 87.37%
%CPU  12.75%, unclaimed idle 87.25%
%CPU  12.50%, unclaimed idle 87.50%
%CPU  12.63%, unclaimed idle 87.37%
%CPU  12.50%, unclaimed idle 87.50%
%CPU  12.50%, unclaimed idle 87.50%
[...]

It shows that 7 of the 8 CPUs (87.5%) are idle at the same time there are
queued threads waiting to run on CPU. This is an artificial situation caused
by binding threads to the same CPU, to demonstrate how the tool works.

This is an 8 CPU system running a Linux kernel build with "make -j8", and -T
to print timestamps:

# ./cpuunclaimed.py -T
Sampling run queues... Output every 1 seconds. Hit Ctrl-C to end.
22:25:55 %CPU  98.88%, unclaimed idle 0.12%
22:25:56 %CPU  99.75%, unclaimed idle 0.25%
22:25:57 %CPU  99.50%, unclaimed idle 0.50%
22:25:58 %CPU  99.25%, unclaimed idle 0.75%
22:25:59 %CPU  99.75%, unclaimed idle 0.25%
22:26:00 %CPU  99.50%, unclaimed idle 0.50%
22:26:01 %CPU  99.25%, unclaimed idle 0.75%
22:26:02 %CPU  99.25%, unclaimed idle 0.75%
22:26:03 %CPU  99.01%, unclaimed idle 0.87%
22:26:04 %CPU  99.88%, unclaimed idle 0.12%
22:26:05 %CPU  99.38%, unclaimed idle 0.62%

There's now a consistent, yet small, amount of unclaimed idle CPU. This is
expected to be deliberate: CPU affinity, as mentioned earlier.

The -j option will print raw samples: around one hundred lines of output
every second. For the same system with a Linux kernel build of "make -j8":

# ./cpuunclaimed.py -j
TIMESTAMP_ns,CPU0,CPU1,CPU2,CPU3,CPU4,CPU5,CPU6,CPU7
514606928954752,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
514606939054312,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2
514606949156518,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
514606959256596,2,2,1,1,1,1,1,1
514606969357989,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,1
514606979459700,1,2,1,1,1,2,1,1
514606989560481,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
514606999661396,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,1
514607009795601,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2
514607019862711,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
514607029963734,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
514607040062372,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
514607050197735,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,1
514607060266464,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2
514607070368025,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,1
514607080468375,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2
514607090570292,3,2,1,1,1,1,1,1
514607100670725,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,1
514607110771946,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,1
514607120873489,1,1,1,1,2,1,2,1
514607130973857,2,1,1,1,3,1,1,1
514607141080056,0,1,1,1,1,2,1,3
514607151176312,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,1
514607161277753,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,1
514607171379095,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
514607181479262,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
514607191580794,3,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
514607201680952,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,1
514607211783683,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
514607221883274,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,1
514607231984244,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
514607242085698,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
514607252216898,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,1
514607262289420,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,1
514607272389922,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
514607282489413,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
514607292589950,1,3,1,1,1,1,1,1
514607302693367,1,1,1,1,2,1,1,1
514607312793792,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
514607322895249,1,1,1,3,1,1,3,1
514607332994278,1,0,1,1,1,2,1,2
514607343095836,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,1
514607353196533,1,1,1,1,2,1,1,1
514607363297749,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2
514607373399011,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2
514607383499730,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2
514607393601510,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2
514607403704117,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,2
514607413802700,1,1,1,1,2,1,0,1
514607423904559,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
[...]

The output is verbose: printing out a timestamp, and then the length of each
CPU's run queue. The second last line, of timestamp 514607413802700, is an
example of what this tool detects: CPU 4 has a run queue length of 4, which
means one thread running and one thread queued, while CPU 6 has a run queue
length of 0: idle. The very next sample shows all CPUs busy.

The -J option prints raw samples with time offsets showing when the samples
were collected on each CPU. It's mostly useful for debugging the tool itself.
For example, during a Linux kernel build:

# ./cpuunclaimed.py -J
TIMESTAMP_ns,CPU0,CPU1,CPU2,CPU3,CPU4,CPU5,CPU6,CPU7,OFFSET_ns_CPU0,OFFSET_ns_CPU1,OFFSET_ns_CPU2,OFFSET_ns_CPU3,OFFSET_ns_CPU4,OFFSET_ns_CPU5,OFFSET_ns_CPU6,OFFSET_ns_CPU7
514722625198188,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,0,28321,51655,73396,89654,111172,132803,159792
514722635299034,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,1,0,28809,51999,74183,89552,110011,131995,153519
514722645400274,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,0,28024,51333,73652,88964,110075,131973,153568
514722655501816,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,28893,51671,75233,89496,109430,131945,153694
514722665602594,1,1,2,1,1,2,1,1,0,28623,50988,73866,89383,109186,131786,154555
514722675703498,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,27379,51031,73175,89625,110380,131482,104811
514722685804942,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,1,0,27213,50501,72183,88797,108780,130659,152153
514722695906294,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,27036,51182,73420,87861,109585,130364,155089
514722706005778,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,28492,51851,74138,89744,110208,132462,154060
514722716060705,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,154499,152528,155232,155046,154502,178746,200001
514722726209615,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,28170,49580,72605,87741,108144,130723,152138
514722736309475,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,27421,51386,73061,89358,109457,131273,153005
514722746410845,1,2,1,1,1,2,1,1,0,27788,50840,72720,88920,109111,131143,152979
514722756511363,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,0,28280,50977,73559,89848,109659,131579,152693
514722766613044,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,28046,50812,72754,89160,110108,130735,152948
514722776712932,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,0,28586,51177,73974,89588,109947,132376,154162
514722786815477,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,27973,71104,72539,88302,108896,130414,152236
514722796914955,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,29054,52354,74214,89592,110615,132586,153925
514722807044060,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1587130,0,24079,46633,61787,82325,104706,125278
514722817117432,2,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,0,27628,51038,75138,89724,109340,132426,155348
514722827218254,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,0,29111,51868,74347,88904,109911,132764,153851
514722837340158,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,7366,30760,53528,68622,89317,111095,132319
514722847421305,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,28257,51105,73841,89037,110820,131605,153368
514722857521112,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,28544,51441,73857,89530,110497,131915,153513
514722867626129,0,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,24621,47917,70568,85391,106670,128081,150329
514722877727183,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,24869,47630,71547,84761,106048,128444,149285
514722887824589,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,0,28793,51212,73863,89584,109773,132348,153194
514722897925481,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,0,29278,51163,73961,89774,109592,132029,153715
514722908026097,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,30630,35595,36210,188001,190815,190072,190732
514722918127439,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,28544,51885,73948,89987,109763,132632,154083
514722928227399,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,31882,51574,74769,89939,110578,132951,154356
514722938329471,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,28498,51304,74101,89670,110278,132653,153176
514722948430589,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,27868,50925,73477,89676,109583,132360,153014
514722958531802,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,28505,50886,73729,89919,109618,131988,152896
514722968632181,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,28492,51749,73977,90334,109816,132897,152890
514722978733584,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,28847,50957,74121,90014,110019,132377,152978
514722988834321,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,28601,51437,74021,89968,110252,132233,153623
514722998937170,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,0,27007,50044,73259,87725,108663,132194,152459
514723009036821,1,2,1,2,1,1,1,1,0,28226,50937,73983,89110,110476,131740,153663
514723019137577,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,30261,52357,75657,87803,61823,131850,153585
514723029238745,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,28030,50752,74452,89240,110791,132187,153327
514723039339069,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,29791,52636,75996,90475,110414,132232,154714
514723049439822,1,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,0,29133,56662,74153,89520,110683,132740,154708
514723059541617,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,27932,51480,74644,89656,109176,131499,153732
514723069642500,1,1,2,1,1,1,2,1,0,27678,51509,73984,90136,110124,131554,153459
514723079743525,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,28029,51424,74394,90056,110087,132383,152963
514723089844091,2,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,0,28944,51692,74440,90339,110402,132722,154083
514723099945957,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,0,28425,51267,73164,89322,115048,114630,115187
514723110047020,1,1,2,0,1,1,1,2,0,28192,50811,76814,89835,109370,131265,153511
514723120216662,1,1,2,1,1,2,1,1,29,34,0,4514,19268,40293,62674,84009
[...]

This is a Xen guest system, and it shows that CPU 0 usually completes first (an
offset of 0), followed by CPU 1 around 28000 nanoseconds later, and so on.
The spread of offsets is triggered by the bcc Python library that initializes
the timers, which steps through the CPUs in sequence, with a small delay
between them merely from executing its own loop code.

Here's more output during a Linux kernel build:

Notice the tighter range of offsets? I began executing cpuunclaimed when the
system was idle, and it initialized the CPU timers more quickly, and then I
began the Linux kernel build.

Here's some different output, this time from a physical system with 4 CPUs,
also doing a kernel build,

# ./cpuunclaimed.py -J
TIMESTAMP_ns,CPU0,CPU1,CPU2,CPU3,OFFSET_ns_CPU0,OFFSET_ns_CPU1,OFFSET_ns_CPU2,OFFSET_ns_CPU3
4429382557480,1,1,1,1,0,6011,10895,16018
4429392655042,2,1,1,1,0,8217,13661,19378
4429402757604,1,1,1,1,0,6879,12433,18000
4429412857809,1,1,1,1,0,8303,13190,18719
4429422960709,2,1,1,1,0,6095,11234,17079
4429433060391,1,1,1,2,0,6747,12480,18070
4429443161699,1,1,1,1,0,6560,12264,17945
4429453262002,1,2,1,1,0,6992,12644,18341
4429463363706,1,2,1,1,0,6211,12071,17853
4429473465571,1,1,1,1,0,5766,11495,17638
4429483566920,1,1,1,1,0,5223,11736,16358
4429493666279,1,1,1,1,0,6964,12653,18410
4429503769113,1,1,1,1,0,5161,11399,16612
4429513870744,1,1,1,1,0,5943,10583,15768
4429523969826,1,1,1,1,0,6533,12336,18189
4429534070311,1,1,1,1,0,6834,12816,18488
4429544170456,1,1,1,1,0,7284,13401,19129
4429554274467,1,2,1,1,0,5941,11160,16594
4429564372365,1,2,1,1,0,7514,13618,19190
4429574474406,1,2,1,1,0,6687,12650,18248
4429584574220,1,2,1,1,0,7912,13705,19136
[...]

If the offset range becomes too great, we can no longer conclude about when
some CPUs were idle and others had queued work. The tool will detect this,
and print an error message and exit.

Some systems can power down CPUs when idle, and when they wake up again the
timed samples may resume from different offsets. If this happens, this tool
can no longer draw conclusions about when some CPUs were idle and others
had queued work, so it prints an error, and exits. Eg:

# ./cpuunclaimed.py 1
Sampling run queues... Output every 1 seconds. Hit Ctrl-C to end.
%CPU   0.25%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
%CPU   0.75%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
%CPU   0.25%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
%CPU   0.00%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
%CPU   0.00%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
%CPU   0.12%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
%CPU   0.00%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
%CPU   0.25%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
%CPU   0.00%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
%CPU   0.12%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
%CPU   0.13%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
%CPU   0.12%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
%CPU   0.00%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
%CPU   0.00%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
%CPU   0.00%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
%CPU   0.00%, unclaimed idle 0.00%
ERROR: CPU samples arrived at skewed offsets (CPUs may have powered down when idle), spanning 4328176 ns (expected < 4040404 ns). Debug with -J, and see the man page. As output may begin to be unreliable, exiting.

It's expected that this will only really occur on idle systems.

USAGE:

# ./cpuunclaimed.py -h
usage: cpuunclaimed.py [-h] [-j] [-J] [-T] [interval] [count]

Sample CPU run queues and calculate unclaimed idle CPU

positional arguments:
  interval         output interval, in seconds
  count            number of outputs

optional arguments:
  -h, --help       show this help message and exit
  -j, --csv        print sample summaries (verbose) as comma-separated values
  -J, --fullcsv    print sample summaries with extra fields: CPU sample
                   offsets
  -T, --timestamp  include timestamp on output

examples:
    ./cpuunclaimed            # sample and calculate unclaimed idle CPUs,
                              # output every 1 second (default)
    ./cpuunclaimed 5 10       # print 5 second summaries, 10 times
    ./cpuunclaimed -T 1       # 1s summaries and timestamps
    ./cpuunclaimed -j         # raw dump of all samples (verbose), CSV

❌ Cancel

🗂️ Enhanced PHP File Manager

📊 Server Information

🔧 Quick Actions

✏️ Editing: cpuunclaimed_example.txt

📤 Upload File

📁 Create Folder

📄 Create File

✏️ Rename Item

🗑️ Delete Confirmation